Family: My New Definition

Family: My New Definition.

Posted in Slice of life, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Family: My New Definition

By Catherine Hedge

My schoolmates told me I shouldn’t play with Janice because her mother was (whisper) Divorced!  In 6th grade at Mercy Academy, I wasn’t really certain what that meant.  I just figured her mother must have done something really terrible so her husband left her.  I felt sorry for Janice, but liked her still.  One day after school, we walked to her apartment.  I met her mother, a very sweet anemic-looking woman.  She gave us ginger snaps and lemonade.  I told the school bullies.  After that, I think they took turns walking her home to get free cookies.  I believed I had done something very noble in befriending this exotic girl and was truly sad when she moved away months later.

Divorce was such a foreign concept.  My parents were married over 60 years until we lost our dad.  They were best friends.  I assumed that was how life was supposed to be.  My definition of family was a grouping of individuals based on two parents, multiple children, grandparents, and dozens of uncles, aunts, and cousins. 

My life has played out differently.  So has that of my siblings.  We’ve had the two parent families… for a while.  Then fractures, although terrible painful at the time, brought healing, excitement, and a totally different perspective of family.

My little brother was barely 21 when he met a divorced woman with two children.  My mom was shook up, wondering if this was the right choice for him.  Then she realized that two of her daughters were divorced women with two children.  She hoped we would find someone so nice.  She worked with my sister-in-law’s dad, a highly respected physician.  One day, she called him over to tell him, “I think you ought to know, the man she’s moving in with is my son.” He smiled hugely and replied, “If he’s YOUR son, then she’ll be very happy.” My brother and his wife are still together and best friends.

The rest of us have found our own definitions of “Together” through remarriage, two long-term partners, and a contentment with solitude.  My divorced daughter and her son have two sets of concerned, loving adults and a step-grandparent within 2 miles. Christmas Eve in my family is a boisterous combination of former spouses, sweethearts, his children, her children, their children, and our adored grandchild.  My former mother-in-law and her children love me, though they continue to beat me at Scrabble.  Now, to our great delight, my ex-husband and his partner are engaged.  A great reason for a party!

My siblings and I have grown up to be much closer than we ever were as children.  My sisters and I don’t have to share the same space or clothes, but share memories and dreams for our children and grandchildren.  The men in our lives have opened their hearts to our grandchildren and are adored in return.  One brother is my son’s Sensei, mentoring him in his new career.  My other brother is our family’s history keeper.  His partner (our brother, too!)  generously shares room for all the boxes of slides, 8mm movie reels, and letters.  We love, but also like each other!

I once knew someone who feared that love was a finite quality.  If you shared too much with one person, it naturally diminished the amount left for everyone else.  The greatest gift my original family gave to me was the capacity to see love as infinite.  As our families grow and stretch, so does my heart.

Thanks, Mom and Dad!

Posted in Nostalgia, Slice of life, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

My Adventures in E-Publishing: Round One

By Donna Gillespie

When my first novel (The Light Bearer, Berkley/Putnam 1994) was teetering at the edge of the out-of-print abyss and my publisher didn’t seem interested in putting it out as an e-book, I realized that if I wanted to save my first-born child it was time to strike out on my own. I’d read the blogs of writers who had gotten the rights back to their backlist books and put them up on Kindle and Nook. All seemed giddy with delight at the new life they’d given their books, and it sounded like they were taking champagne baths with the monthly checks they were receiving from Amazon. It looked like a brave new world to me. I wanted in.

Everyone out there giving free advice on this matter said step one is: Get the rights back. So I dug out my old book contract, feeling confident I’d find no ugly surprises there about the publisher retaining the e-rights. Though Light Bearer came out in ’94, the contract dates all the way back to’89. Kindle was not yet a gleam in Jeff Bezos’ eye. Who was even thinking about this stuff way back then? But to my horror some enterprising person in the contracts department had typed in the margin of page two of an otherwise standard publishing contract something about the publisher retaining all rights pertaining “to any electronic technology that may come along in the future.”

I was crushed. The typed letters were faded; maybe I could rub them out. Later I would learn my publisher was alone in this errant spasm of forward-thinking behavior. My book had to get picked up by the one publisher that was psychic.

So I started a campaign to get my book back. My agent suggested I just write them, and ask for the e-rights.

Yeah, that’ll work, I thought. I’d heard publishers were raking in money right and left on e-books, even if the book had stumbled out of the gate first time around. Why would they turn away even the modest-but-steady trickle of income they were likely to get from mine?

My letter got no response. Months passed. My agent made a phone call to someone he knew in the contracts department. Still — crickets.

I had lots of time to ruminate on another odd thing: In 2006, when Light Bearer’s sequel Lady of the Light came out, my publisher had put this book up on Kindle and Nook right away. Why were they so willing to let book number one languish, un-Kindled and un-Nooked? And if they weren’t interested in converting it, why couldn’t I be given a chance to do it?

The mystery festered.

I sent off a second letter into the wormhole that was the contracts department. But this time, one day in the mail, a miracle: A letter granting me all rights to my book, including the e-rights. This letter was suddenly the most precious thing I owned. It was never out of my sight amid the paper avalanches on my writing desk. I opened it several times a day to make sure it was real. Score one for asking anyway, even if you’re sure the answer will be no.

It struck me that it was strange to be celebrating a letter like this, because in the pre-electronic days this would have meant the end of the road for this book. But in this shiny new age it meant rebirth — eternal life, even, as long there’s enough electricity in the world to recharge everyone’s batteries.

So it was time to advance to step two: Getting the book scanned. This book came out in the days when you submitted a pile of pages to the editor. I did have a computer back then, but the book was on thirty 400K floppies, created on a computer found only in Macintosh museums.

You must sacrifice a book to do this: its spine is ripped off, and you get it back as a tattered pile of pages. For some reason this bothered me. It seemed cruel to the book. Well, you gotta crack a few eggs…So off I was to the one printing place in San Francisco that had the right kind of scanner. I walked in there feeling otherworldly. Sacrificing a book to give it eternal life…my life was becoming mythic.

And soon I was on my way, with my scanned book compacted into one huge Word file. As luck would have it I had major surgery coming up, requiring me to pretty much go nowhere for three months. No noisome interruptions like, having to go to work. Rewrite time!

But then I was confronted with something that required the courage of Xena the Warrior Princess — rereading something I’d written 17 years ago. I was braced for outdated thoughts, outmoded writing strategies, outlandish lines of dialogue, any number of unnamable horrors. I couldn’t open up the file. I was terrified of my own book.

But after a week of circling the computer in frustration, I jumped in. And found, to my huge relief, the passing of years must have magnified these problems in my mind — or maybe I’d just been kidding myself about how much my writing had improved and changed through the years. After all, who wants to believe they’ve been writing forever and haven’t gotten any better?

It was eerily like reading someone else’s book. I’d forgotten how I’d extricated characters from their various predicaments, which, thankfully, kept the work from becoming boring. And, blessedly, my normally snarly internal critic gave the book a reluctant pass and deemed it mostly “o.k.” Whew.

I did what I think of as a mild rewrite — I found places where I didn’t think I’d taken enough advantage of the dramatic possibilities of a situation, a setting, or had missed an opportunity to create more atmosphere. But the most satisfying part was incorporating new research. The whole process illuminated yet another wonder of the e-publishing world: We can rewrite our books, really rewrite them — (assuming, of course, we’ve decided an old book is worth saving). This is big news. In the old days, once a book was frozen into print, that was it. Only the writing megastars got to do a rewrite beyond this point — writers so valued by their publisher that the house was forced to yield to their demands. John Fowles rewrote The Magus after it had been out for a decade or so. Stephen King did the same for The Stand. But now, any one of us with an old book out there can do this. And I predict that in twenty years, no one will be able to figure out why anyone would think this worth remarking on in a blog. It will just be normal.

And I solved right away the riddle of why publishers can’t be bothered with Kindling and Nooking books written before manuscripts were submitted electronically — scanner errors. There are constellations of them and they are fiendishly hard to spot. The letter “I” becomes the number “1”; r’s are turned into n’s. Punctuation is added in odd places, or lines are omitted altogether. It was close, exhausting work. I could easily imagine that a publisher would not have the time or the personnel to devote to a project that, from their perspective, would not yield that much in financial returns.

All this was the work of four months. Then, once again, I had to let the old book go, feeling again that wretchedness that’s like losing a beloved home — you realize that never again will you be able to inhabit those comfortable, familiar scenes. It was time to advance to steps three and four:

3) Finding a graphic artist to design a new cover. You can’t use the publisher’s cover; it belongs to the artist.

4) Finding the right e-book conversion service amidst the sea of services I turned up on a Google search.

But the hardest part was over … wasn’t it?

More to come!

About me…

I’m the author of two novels set in ancient Rome, The Light Bearer (Berkley/Putnam, 1994) and Lady of the Light (Berkley/Putnam, 2006). Light Bearer has been translated into German, Dutch, Russian and Italian, and is available in the UK. In 2001 it was optioned by Hallmark Entertainment for a miniseries that has never been produced (but hope never dies!). Lady of the Light has been translated into German and Italian. I have also published articles and book reviews, and have edited manuscripts for online services. Recently I was asked to write the foreward for the re-release of Pauline Gedge’s novel of Boudicca’s revolt, The Eagle and the Raven, which thrilled and amazed me because she, along with Mary Renault and Robert Graves, had always been one of my idols. Currently I live in San Francisco — I came here from Florida back in 1971 and decided to stay. Right now I’m working as a teacher’s aide at a San Francisco middle school and I’m the copyeditor and occasional contributor to my neighborhood newspaper, The New Fillmore, where the best part of the job is that they let me write the crime reports. And I’m working on the third book in the series that began with The Light Bearer.

I was a student of Leonard Bishop’s for seven years, from 1976 to 1983, part of an ongoing writer’s workshop that had grown out of his novel writing class at UC Berkeley Extension. I don’t think I ever would have made the leap from short stories to a novel without Leonard’s constant carping and encouragement. Those Monday night meetings were like revival meetings for writers — even if you’d been languishing in the depths of writing despair throughout the week, on Monday nights you walked out of his class knowing without question that writing was the most necessary thing you could be doing for the planet. Sell the house, sell the kids. Lose the boyfriend, lose the job. Just write. It was a holy mission. He told us that all time you spent writing mattered, even if you eventually threw the whole scene away. “Writing begets writing,” I remember him saying again and again.

His theories on craft and techniques of maintaining suspense dazzled me. They seemed to come from a fathomless well — I don’t think I ever heard him explain anything the same way twice. So if you didn’t get it the first time you were bound to eventually. That is, as long as you kept submitting chapters to the group.

For four years I gave him short stories because I couldn’t get a novel started. All my stories broke off after 30 pages. They just refused to become novels. Leonard was nice about it; he never mentioned the fact that perhaps I shouldn’t be there. (It was, after all, a novel writing workshop, and in a class of 30 I was the only one who wasn’t turning in chapters.) But while my back was turned and I was hardly aware of it, he was convincing me I was capable of writing a novel.

Then another thing happened — the catalyst, I guess. I discovered Rome. I’d had this idea all along that the novel had to be contemporary. (I have no idea why.) Then I saw the miniseries based on Robert Graves’ I Claudius on PBS. And first century Rome took over my life. I was going back and forth to the San Francisco Library, snatching up eight books at a time — the limit allowed — anything with Rome in the title. I finally started what I knew was going to be a novel, and presented Leonard with a small stack of pages with “Chapter One” at the top — a miracle. Of course it was set in Rome. And soon I burst past that 30-page limit hardly knowing it was there.

When Berkley/Putnam bought the book, I had a whole additional draft to do. By this time Leonard had left San Francisco and was teaching in Kansas, but I continued to submit chapters to him through the mail. His critiques, blistering, concise, sometimes typed so enthusiastically that he punched a hole in the paper when he typed the letter “o”, continued to come. He was loud, even on the page. I still hear him barking in my ear from time to time. The book I began in Leonard’s class was The Light Bearer, and it’s Leonard’s book as much as mine. He always got mad when I tried to tell him that. But it was true.

Posted in Leonard Bishop, Publishing, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Keeping up

Keeping up.

Posted in Slice of life, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Keeping up

By Catherine Hedge

It used to be easy to be a pen pal.  If you only responded when you received a letter, you had at least two weeks before you had to write another one…a week for your letter to arrive and another week before you’d get one back.  I assumed that my pen pal would grace me with a day or two to get my thoughts together…or a week or two.  I had the most annoying pen pals, the ones who are really good at writing quickly, cleverly, and including pictures.   I always felt like Miss Havisham in Great Expectations, immobilized by time with nothing interesting to say.

Now, in an instant, I can click “Like” and someone will know I’m thinking about them.  I have a tool that checks my spelling, makes my writing look tidy, and throws my words out to the world instantly.  The only problem is I still need to write the blamed thing!

I am surrounded by amazing, driven, efficient writers.  You’d think I could learn something from them.  Instead, my best hours are right before a deadline, the dark hours late into the night before our group meets.  I think if they ever saw me with my normal bright eyes and vigor, they’d think a Doppelganger had emerged from the basement.

Oh, how I admire my colleagues!!

Mark is editing his third novel, designing his cover for his e-book.  Maybe a month or two away from release.

Marie is resting after her blow out party to celebrate the release of her Valknut, The Binding.

Char is mid-way through her rewrite of her first novel.  Her fingers are on fire!

And Donna Gillespie…TA DA!  has just today uploaded her classy novel, The Light Bearer, (A best-seller on it’s original release) onto Kindle and has already had sales!  (Her blog will appear as soon as all the links are finished for her upload.)

Meanwhile, Uncle Bill and I keep plodding along.   You’ll have to be patient with us.  But, like those old pen pal letters, we hope you’ll find the final pieces worth the wait.  He should ask his wife,  my Aunt Danelle.  I still haven’t answered her last letter from when I was 17!

Uncle Bill is getting some responses to his writing, however.  Below is  a glimpse of what his older brother did after he read Uncle Bill’s blog.

Posted in Slice of life, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A Great Dog to Blog

A Great Dog to Blog.

Posted in Slice of life, Writing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Great Dog to Blog

By Catherine Hedge

I solved my dilemma, to Blog or to Dog.   It turns out that those two choices have a lot in common.  Both are approached with fears, defined by trial and error, and launched with blind hope.

I discovered this while accompanying my sister, Celeste Gantz, to the Healdsburg Animal Shelter. Bailey, Celeste and her husband’s dog died, much to our great grief.  Their home was much too quiet.  No nails clicking on the hardwood floors at midnight.  No wet dog toys stuffed in the corner of the couch.  A half-full bag of treaties left beside the cereal.  We all miss him.

Celeste saw an ad on-line for “Cooper” at the shelter.  He looked friendly, substantial, a “doggy dog”.  All morning she debated whether we should go check him out.  What if it was too soon after Bailey died?  How could she leave him behind if he might be euthanized?  What would she do if she liked him, but Clay didn’t?  We went to get coffee and pastries instead.   Stalling.

Later, Clay asked us if we’d seen him.  No good excuses left.  It was only 2:00.  Three hours before the shelter closed.

On the 20-minute drive, Celeste brainstormed all the reasons she should have a dog and the many reasons she shouldn’t.   “Dogs are inconvenient…” was her last comment as she leapt out of her car.

We met with Cooper and Celeste took him through his paces.  He sat when commanded, stayed, didn’t jump much, and let us pet him.  He was clean, healthy…a very adoptable dog.  He checked out the pee scents in the yard and came to us only when commanded.  Celeste didn’t smile much.

She decided to fill out the paperwork and think about it.  Just as she was leaving the counter, she said to the staff, “It’s hard to decide.  We’ve always been more of a Lab, Sheltie family.”  In chorus, the two women said, “Have you seen Cowboy?”  There was such joy in their voices,  Celeste and I turned toward each other and mouthed, “Cowboy?”

Four seconds later, (They were fast!) we stood in front of “Cowboy”.   He stared up at us as if we were the loves of his life.   Celeste gasped and her tears shot straight out.  She put her hand to her heart and cried, “Now, that’s what I’m talking about!”

We took him out to the yard and he did all the same routines.  The difference was, when she said, “Good Dog!”, he wriggled all the way from  his slobbery tongue to his otter-like tail.  She called Clay and he was there in moments.  The joy in her voice was all he needed to hear.  When Clay walked into the dog yard, Cowboy greeted him by bowing his head.  He pressed his forehead and snout gently against Clay’s thigh.

Well done, Dog!  The deal was done.

So, does this sound like your blog?  You’re afraid to start.  You think of a ton of reasons why you can’t or why your topic is no good.  You stall.  There’s a deadline.  You start with a standard bag of techniques to create a logical, reasonable piece.  It could be okay.  But something’s missing!  You try again, maybe even starting over.  Finally, whether it’s a line that makes you laugh or weep, you call out, “Now, That’s what I’m talking about!”  You’ve found the flow.  The deal is done.

You should know, we’ve called him “Jake”.

(We’ve since learned Healdsburg is a “no-kill” shelter.  Check out where our pal is now living happily!  Gantz Family Vineyards.  Celeste, good luck on your blog!)

Posted in Dogs, Slice of life, Writing | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

Writing and Christmas

Writing and Christmas.

Posted in Slice of life, Writing | Leave a comment

Writing and Christmas

By Uncle Bill

My niece Cathy has exposed me for the fraud that I am.  For years, generations in fact, I have been able to fool my family into believing I have talent. The trick has been working tirelessly on a Christmas letter each year avoiding the normal personal family news; and instead focusing on family history, or in some cases absolutly absurd stories that would be fitting of Ted from the Sally Forth comics.

I will admit to one brilliant year however. Since I am the youngest of seven children I missed a lot of earlier Christmases. So one year I interviewed all of my older siblings about their childhood Christmas experiences and put them, along with my own, into a five page Christmas letter. I mailed this out to every family member with the hope it would be a Christmas “memory” for future generations. I encourage you to do the same.

Personally it brought me understanding of life in the family before me. I knew we were among the “working poor”, but I never appreciated the sacrifices of my parents and also of my brothers and sisters.  I never knew of the tool box and table my dad built for my oldest brother. And the feeling of loss when the family moved and couldn’t take it with them. It was a memory that lasted from Gene’s age of ten to his passing at seventy five. My oldest sister had no memories of the earliest years.  Another sister wanted to focus only on her own children and not on herself.

But I was able to have fun with the letter too. I was able to call my other brother (Mom’s favorite) a spoiled brat, attributing the comment to one of my sisters. For everyone it brought back memories of favorite presents, simple but thoughtful; of Midnight Mass, two in the morning breakfasts and game playing with above mentioned spoiled brat.

As for writing skill, I can only say I appreciate yours, the “Pen in Hand” authors and bloggers.

Oh, by the way, I have asked family members about the letter.

No one remembers it.

(Uncle Bill writes from Seattle, Washington.  His letters are still my favorite. Catherine)

Posted in Nostalgia, Slice of life, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Creating a Civil Writing Group

Creating a Civil Writing Group.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment