Creating a Civil Writing Group

By Catherine Hedge

Following the advice of Charlene Newcomb, I get myself to a writer’s group every week.  We started with an incredibly strong leader who kept us in control, but that’s not always the case!  Spiteful, negative reviewers can doom a writing group.  So can members who can only say, “That’s lovely! Read More! More!” no matter what someone reads.

In our group, we read our manuscripts aloud, usually 3-10 pages.  Others have found success printing multiple copies or e-mailing their pieces in advance.

To keep our dialogue civil and informative, we have created a document outlining the norms of our group.  Please feel free to use whatever might be helpful for you and your colleagues.

Welcome to our writing group!!

FounderMr. Leonard Bishop, author of  Dare to Be a Great Writer

Mission:  We are professional writers.  We believe that by sharing our writing and insight, we will strengthen our own writing and assist others in deepening their abilities.  We welcome others who believe in this goal.

Purpose:  We are here to comment on the totality of a work.  Our purpose is to help each other learn the techniques to write interestingly, with dramatics, continuity, invention, and originality.

 Hints for Success:

When reading your work, please consider:

You are the most important critic.  Take the comments of others into consideration, but remember that it is your book.  You alone see the entirety of your novel, but others may have valuable input.  Please do not defend your piece or interrupt during comments.

  • If at all possible, bring something currently written.
  • Others will want to read, so please limit your selection.

When commenting on the work of others:

  • Please remember that we are here to help others.  Consider how to phrase your comments to share what could be done…not what should not have been done.
  • Please limit editorial comments such as word choice, sentence structure, and grammar to general statements.
  • Please do not interrupt others as they comment, unless the individual is taking too much time (leaders will determine.)
  • Feel free to comment, even if you have not brought a manuscript.

Forbidden phrases:

  • “It’s in the next chapter” (If we need it, we probably need it now!)
  • “Let me tell you what is going to happen…”(Let us find out.  We don’t want to spoil the surprise!)
  • “Publishers want…Editors want…”  These are very limiting statements.  By holding back or changing to fit current publishing dictates that will always change, we will not experiment and discover the story we have.

Thank you for being here with us!  Your presence makes us stronger.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Get thee to a writing group

by Charlene Newcomb

Aspiring writers note: get thee to a writing group. Writing in isolation is like singing in the shower. There is no one there to tell you that you’re tone deaf. Well, unless you take communal showers…uh…let’s not go there. You’re alone. In the shower. Or…alone at the keyboard.

under the magnifying glassThere have been some great posts about critique groups in recent weeks. Kristen Lamb points out the good and bad of participation and offers an alternative kind of feedback that she calls the “concept critique”. Juli Page Morgan loves her current crit group and pointed me to an older post on advice to ignore by author Anne R. Allen.

The key is finding the right group. Finding what works for you. Your writing is personal and your critique partners aren’t in your head. You shouldn’t feel like you’re under a microscope (or a magnifying glass). But feedback is critical – just remember to take it with a grain of salt.

My writers group has been an important part of my life for the last three years.  I know they’ll find good things to say about the works I share. I know they’ll point out a spot or five where I’ve missed the mark, could hold a moment longer, or should consider xyz. They bring another set of eyes (or ears), another perspective, and give me an opportunity to make my work better.   –Char

———–
[Creative Commons licensed image by Flickr user
 S P Photography]

Posted in Writing | Tagged | 7 Comments

Blog or Dog?

Blog or Dog?.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Blog or Dog?

By Catherine Hedge

These days when people discover time they didn’t have before, they often get two suggestions:

1.  Write a blog

2. Get a dog

Both offer a way to fill time, as if that’s a problem.  They tell you that it will keep you engaged mentally. You can’t  mind-meld with the remote and Roku if Fluffy is nipping your toes.  Neither can you avoid the little counter reminding you to post before Friday.  The social connection for both  is a real temptation.   “You’ll meet the most interesting people.” That’s right.  I’ve read some really clever material, but scooping has never lead me to a long- term friendship.  I thrive on positive feedback and dogs are experts at that.   My sister’s lab Bailey was never more than two feet away from her, his big brown eyes looking up at her like The Adoration of St. Teresa.    Comments are supposed to do that, in theory.  They tell me a blog can help me sell my novels once I post them.  I don’t think Fluffy can do that.  So, it comes down to decision time.  I choose the blog.  Then I won’t have to cover my kitchen floor with newspapers.

Posted in Dogs, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

When I write, I have the Ultimate Power! by Catherine Hedge

When I write, I have the Ultimate Power! by Catherine Hedge.

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

When I write, I have the Ultimate Power! by Catherine Hedge

I get to work with middle school students. I’m often asked to be a guest speaker as the resident “Real Writer” in my Midwestern school. Every time I present, I make students stand beside their desks and repeat after me, “When I write, I have the Ultimate Power!” We make fists like the Hulk and lunge forward. After the laughter dies down, I tell them why.

You are the only person in the entire world who has had your experiences, your emotions…who has seen what you have seen and could explain it in the words you choose. There is no one, ever in all time, who can tell your story except for you. No one can observe the world and report on it the way you can. If you don’t write what is inside you, it will never exist. And that is power.

When we write and write well, we also touch others’ lives. For those moments when readers read what we have to say, they feel what we have felt. See what we have seen. Even if that person lives a thousand years from today. In that way, when we write, we can live forever.

So, all you writers out there….Stand up. Repeat after me.

“When I write….(fists up. Flex those biceps) I have the ULTIMATE POWER!”

(Dedicated with love to my inspiration, My writing coach, Mr. Leonard Bishop 1922-2002 (Author of “Dare to Be a Great Writer.” )

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Skating on your Ankles by Joseph Franklin Hedge

Skating on your Ankles by Joseph Franklin Hedge.

Posted in Slice of life | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Skating on your Ankles by Joseph Franklin Hedge

(Forward) January in Kansas is supposed to be cold, snowy, and blustery.  But not this year.   It hit 60 Friday.  I’m usually a cold weather wimp.  My preferred winter activity is sitting in front of the fireplace with a cup of cocoa laced with Irish Cream.  Mmmm, pass the chocolate chip cookies,please!  But this year, I’m missing winter.  My grandson sits on the couch in his new fluffy snowpants and asks when we can go ice skating.  The blue sled Mark and my son refurbished hangs forlornly in a dark corner of the garage.  Dang Global Warming!

So, I pulled out a story my dad, Joseph Hedge (1925-2009), wrote many years ago about his childhood winters in Anaconda, Montana.  I hope it brings a frosty chill to your bones!

Thanks, Pop!

Skating On Your Ankles

By Joseph F. Hedge

In my home town, somewhere around the beginning of November, The weather turns from Indian summer to fall and then a quick turn to winter.  The snow seems to pile up almost overnight.  Then the city workers prepare our city commons for ice skating.  The commons encompasses a full square block and the skating rink a circle within that.  The fire department floods the skating area on the first day that the temperature hits freezing.  This is not a problem in Montana.  This is the average temperature from November to March.

We go to the skating rink daily to check the surface.  We hope the ice is ready for us.  Meanwhile, a shelter is constructed.  It has benches for changing into your skates.  A huge stove is in the middle of the shelter.  Soon, it will be surrounded by those nearly frozen from staying on the rink too long or others warming up before going out.

We celebrate the approaching Christmas season as a huge Christmas tree is placed dead-center  of the rink.  Its average height is fifty feet and decorated by lights from top to bottom.  Strings of lights extend from the tree to six points on the rim of the rink.  A stereo plays seasonal music so you can skate in rhythm.

My first year of skating included a pair of ice-skates that clamped on to your street shoes.  They would come loose before you could make a whole lap around the rink.  They would release from not being put on tight enough, or the sole of your shoe would release.  That was more often the case.  I have my first pair of shoe skates, passed on by someone with a size seven foot.  I am size five and a half.  This is a good reason for buying a local newspaper and wool socks.  It doesn’t matter.  I have shoe skates and am ready for the winter.

I sharpen the blades, oil the shoes, and carry them over my shoulder to the rink.  Now inside the change house, I begin putting on my skates.  It is warm and smells of wood burning and apples cooking on top of the stove.  Some are done, some burning, and some burnt.

I start down the steps toward the ice.  I plan to skate like Sonja Henie, the current Olympic skating champion.  Why not me?  I may someday be that good.  Days before coming to the rink, I put on my skates.  I stood on them, proving to myself that I would be able to skate.

I reach the ice, my courage on hand, my desire at the peak, my ankles at right angles to the ice.  I take five steps in the direction of the tree.  I coast fine, ankles erect.  Then I need more momentum.  I stroke hard and my ankles bend to the will of the ice.

My best friend, Dick  (who always has the best equipment no matter what) doesn’t have normal skates.  He has RACERS.  I try to keep up with him, but my efforts are futile.  I go to the side and sit on the four foot piles of snow that rims the rink.  I watch those with steel ankles skate to the music.

Not to be deterred, I go back on the ice, about six feet out, and ankle-power to the snow pile.  I jump in and sink waist deep.  Dick comes over and follows the routine and jumps in.  Sam follows.  Then Fred Hunkle follows.  We’ve found a new game.  I am able to participate with oversized skates, ankles a little sore, but I can jump as far as the rest.

After four jumps in the snow, chills begin to set in.  All of us start to the change house, those who could skate and those of us that ankle-hooked their way.  The change house is warm and the time growing late.  We are due home shortly, but the smell of the change house and the view of the lighted tree remain as a beautiful memory.  The thought of skating on my ankles has abandoned me.  Thanks, anyway.

Posted in Slice of life, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

A Dollar In The Jar (by K.P. Kollenborn)

When you’re lucky, you get someone who believes in your art.  That’s very pleasant.  However, when the planets align perfectly, you get someone who can teach you how to hone your craft.  Someone like Leonard Bishop, our inspiration for this blog.

Our good friend, K.P. Kollenborn, author of Eyes Behind Belligerence, has kindly agreed to let us repost her original blog from April 10, 2009.  In sharing Leonard Bishop’s history, she also gives a first hand account of how this man taught us to believe in ourselves.  Thank you, K.P.!

A Dollar in the Jar: Tribute to Leonard Bishop

K.P. Kollenborn

 Beginnings

When I rang the door bell in the summer of 2000, a plump man in his late seventies answered. He looked similar to Rodney Dangerfield, especially in the nose. We had never met before, and I wasn’t certain if my friend, who had initially invited me, informed him about my arrival. The writer’s meeting was supposed to start at 7:30 p.m. every Thursday. It had been a ritual for nearly a decade. He tilted a half smile anyway, eyes beaming at a pretty girl, and invited me in. His white T-shirt and dark, crinkly slacks was not the style I had envisioned. Also, it was evident he needed a hair cut because the length reached over his ears. I had envisioned a distinguished beard or pipe or even a brown sweater with leather patches at the elbows. After all, wasn’t that a standard for aging writers?

I followed him into his dining room, a short distance from the front door. He had a slight limp, which later I learned about his club foot, one of the many difficulties he overcame in his long life. In the middle of the room stretched a lengthy table. He sat at the head of it and I was amazed to see his walls camouflaged in prints of  paintings, from top to bottom like an incomplete Rubik’s Cube. Picasso was the only one I had recognized, much to my ignorance at that time. Another wall supported shelves and shelves of books. The mismatched coloring of the book covers mirrored Picasso’s wild designs. In a corner, a baby grand piano faced a large window, opposite from the fireplace.

Leonard had been famous in his time. He was a published writer since the 1950’s and knew other legendary authors like Mario Puzo, Joseph Heller, Thomas Berger, and James T. Farrell. He left a trail of other writing groups from coast to coast. I didn’t know what to expect from him, whether he would be harsh or boring, arrogant or humble. After all, I sat in his dining room instead of a classroom, and yet, a fragment of people in my Kansas hometown knew about his presence. He used to write for my local newspaper, The Manhattan Mercury. My hometown took him for granted, not appreciating an accomplished writer who dwelled among us.

While Leonard chatted about the hot weather, his fat dog, a Cocker Spaniel with a lovable personality, wobbled into the room. I began stroking the panting, hairy pet.

“That’s Mugsy. Abbreviation for an overweight sausage,” Leonard joked, speaking with a New York, Jewish accent. “You think he looks like one? Yeah? He wouldn’t look like one if I didn’t look like one. That’s the problem!”

I liked him without delay. Despite his rough exterior, pitted face, and thick fingers, he had a simple humor about him. During the two years I knew Leonard, I learned of the obstacles and misfortunes he underwent to gain his success. He emerged out of the ghetto, far from a modest origin unlike mine, a middle class upbringing. It was at that point I realized writing could also be a means of survival. His beginnings weren’t as graceful as mine, to say in the least.

“Grass, Milk, and Children”

Leonard Bishop, born October 17, 1922, grew up in New York City in severe poverty. His father, Edward, was a criminal, heroin addict, and wife beater who exhausted time in every prison in the state of New York and parts of New Jersey. Once, Leonard and his older brother, Bernard, spent a year in a Catholic orphanage because, while his father stooped in jail, his mother, Esther, had no other means to feed or clothe her children. He told a story of sitting in a long, tin bath tub with ten or fifteen other children as the nuns splashed scalding water on their heads and scrubbed their fingers with wire brushes.

In addition, he was born with a club foot and dyslexia. His nickname was “Feets.” Often, teachers branded him as either lazy or stupid, and often he sat in a corner with the pointed “Dunce” hat. At one point in his young life, he became a hobo and traveled all over the country on trains. It would seem fate had dismissed his life at the bottom of a bucket. Yet, ironically, a hobo woman gave Leonard a thick book she carried in her tattered bag and taught him to read. This woman, whom he’d forgotten her name but the title, Beau Geste, inspired him to achieve more in his life. That and “feeling jinxed.” He had been nearly killed on a few occasions, details he never spoke of. “If you believe in luck,” he argued, “you know she’s and ill-dispositioned lover.” So he returned home and enrolled in college, The New School of Social Research, a school born out of the New Deal.

Leonard attended a creative writing class, along with people like Mario Puzo. Feeling intimidated by them because they were better educated, he wrote anyway. “[I] wanted to write. To slam the words on paper and make them scream. One word would start it. A word ripped out of [my] guts to start the pool of blood. Then fill it up. With tissue and vein and muscle and thought. Then give it to people. And let them see [a] man.”

One professor, Dr. Glicksberg, who didn’t judge his writings strictly as obscene, detected a gift. With a limited vocabulary, Leonard wrote simply and wrote with aggressive realism, repeatedly using foul language. His professor used a series of asterisks in replacement of the obscenities when he passed other copies to the class. In his introduction from his book, Dare to be a Great Writer, he noted: “The instructor said, ‘Crude, yes. You might even say they [your characters] were ill-mannered, and vulgar. But they stink with power!’. . . It was the dynamic that came from the Great Depression starvation and the scrabble to stay alive. The other students wanted to hear what I wrote.”

In one of his short stories, “Grass, Milk, and Children,” an account about children of the slums, he wrote: “When I was four years old, I spoke to God. I begged him to pay the rent for us . . . It was cold and dirty sleeping in the street . . . [but] God put his oily tongue in his fat cheek and watched me. When I cried, he didn’t dry my tears . . . And I knew that God was a lie . . . God is the cold and the dirt and the cement and the shadows and the rains. . . God is a dirty cellar without music.”

The bitter tones that repeatedly excelled in his writings likewise excelled in compassion. “The word . . . that replaces hate is humanity . . . A voice that tells humanity. Living until the skin of your soul is filled to the last pore. Until every sift and sound and touch and smell and taste opens its arms and pulls you in. To be alive. That is holy, that is sacred.”

A Gift

The second time I arrived on time for class, I again spent a few moments alone with Leonard before the others would materialized. I enjoyed the personal attention. His kindness and wisdom made me feel unique. He had a special gift for that. Reaching in his bookcase, he removed one that he had written, Dare to be a Great Writer: 329 Keys to Powerful Fiction.

Handing it to me, he humorously said, “This isn’t a bad book. You might want to consider it for future references.” In the chapters, which are outlined like a study guide, a list of “Don’ts” appear in the back. “Don’t Fear the Novel’s Size.” “Don’t Postpone Your Novel.” “Don’t Marry Another Writer.” And my favorite, “Don’t Quit Your (Day) Job.” There is no particular order of his book, and the convenience is comparable to a recipe album. If there is something you need offhand, rather than reading an entire chapter to seek advice, you search the index for development of characters, dialogue, flashbacks, and so forth, then the specific element under that listing.

“Why do you want to write?” he once asked me.

I shrugged and replied, “Because I just do.” I felt silly with that answer. It offered no illumination to the meaning of life, as writers are supposed to inherit, or so I’ve read. But above all, it felt more of a childish response compared to his life experiences.

Leonard lifted his brows and proceeded, “You don’t even have to be a talented writer to write. Did you know that? You just need the will to write. The more you do it, the better you become.” He beamed a cocky smile. “Now that’s good advice. You better write it down!”

The Overfed Butcher

Three months into his classes, and after a harsh disagreement with another professor, he left college. Of course his departure didn’t stop him from writing. With the help from Dr. Glicksberg, Leonard entered a writer’s contest and won $500. It was a proud day. That same day, he received a phone call from Bernard, his brother. Their father had been pacing in an apartment’s hallway, with a loaded gun, waiting for their mother to return home.

When Leonard arrived at the top of the staircase, his check still stashed in his coat’s pocket, he watched his father pace like a rabid dog, high on heroin. Leonard’s anger overwhelmed him. He lunged for his father.  Bernard pulled him away and slammed him against the wall, telling him the importance of Jewish traditions, that sons should never hit fathers, despite the numerous times their father hit them.

“I was deeply shocked,” Leonard wrote. “Not because he [my father] was trying to kill my mother (he had tried it several times before) but because I could see myself ten years from now, standing inside my father’s skin . . . I was against the wall, clawing for an opening to hide in. I could hear the shovels of hell clattering at me, feel the opened oven searing my soul, and I was terrified. It was then that I decided to use my typewriter to become an author.”

Two years later in 1952, he published his first novel, Down All Your Streets. The writing contest caught the attention of Dial Press and offered him a contract. He saw opportunity. “I was a dummy, but I was not stupid.” He continued to write about his life experiences. About violence. Poverty. Drug addiction. Lost loves.

Shortly after his first publication, he ran into a childhood classmate while on the subway. “Feets! Hey Feets!” his classmate cried out. “You’re not gonna believe this! There’s some guy usin’ your name on a book! Maybe you oughta sue the guy and get some money, huh?”

Leonard didn’t tell his former classmate that the “guy” was really him. He laughed it off as if a coincidence. For a man, who grew up in a tough environment, to admit he was a writer would be as if admitting he were “weak,” a “sissy,” or even a “homosexual.”

Despite the stereotypes, his career catapulted him out from the ghetto. The confidence that followed slowly transformed into teaching. He started at Columbia University in the mid 50’s. He never finished college, but his gift superseded his academic credentials. Working with James T. Farrell as part of “team teaching,” Leonard learned the skills of a teacher as well as a writer. Farrell, who was best known for his Studs Lonigan trilogy, taught the value of naturalism. Raised in  poverty himself in Chicago, Farrell and Leonard developed a strong admiration and friendship, no matter how heated their arguments became at times. Their friendship lasted for twenty years until Farrell’s death.

Leonard’s style of writing was recognized by the Gold Medal Author in the early 60’s. Twice. Make My Bed in Hell and The Desire Years dealt with youth and misery. His voice differed greatly from Fitzgerald, Hemingway, and Steinbeck. His tone erupted during period when American culture began seeking for radical impulses. It was fresh like that of Pollack and disturbing like that of Picasso. It entertained and shocked just like “The Blackboard Jungle,” “Rebel Without a Cause,” and “The Wild One.”

His need to write in cafeterias at night inspired him because people of all lifestyles crawled out of their hiding places. And he liked the darkness. No only that, but he confessed, “If I didn’t write in cafeterias, how else would people know I’m a writer? I don’t look like one; I look like an overfed butcher.”

In the late 60’s, his career shifted to the West Coast when one of his books, Against Heaven’s Hand, was to be made into a movie. The producers changed the title to “Seven In Darkness.” It sounded more compelling. Granted the movie was designed for television, but Leonard stuck around in California anyway and re-established his friendship with Mario Puzo. In that sunny state, he found several teaching jobs, ranging from University of San Francisco, Haywood, and his last stop, Berkeley. At Berkeley he taught Donna Gillespie, Donna Levin, Catherine Endicott, and Carolyn Dotie: a new breed of writers. He is also one out of seven writing teachers whose name resides in Who’s Who of American Authors.

During the early 80’s, he married his second wife, Celia, and followed her to her home state of Kansas. He continued teaching private groups until his death in late December of 2002. After years of achieving a distinguished legacy, he finally felt satisfied with his life. “I was no longer a low bum, a hobo, a loser,” he wrote. “I had faced the challenge of Opportunity and dared to claim it for my life. ‘Hey, God, look at me, I’m gonna live, I’m an author!’ I was an author. I would dare to become a great writer . . . You get what you dare, baby, and if you want it big, you dare big . . .”

To Hell with Talent

By the end of the year of 2000, I knew I found a teacher who could tutor my meek abilities as a writer and advance my own voice. Granted, the entire process actually took two years before I understood much of what he advised. About prose. About creating your characters into human beings. About locating stiffness in your writing and bending it to flow smoothly. Writing is not easy. Nor is it natural. It takes stubbornness and the sensibility to endure criticism. To improve and keep improving.

Out of all the lessons I had learned, Leonard emphasized on the misconceptions of inspiration and writer’s block, (that to write well one must have divine inspiration, and if one lacks inspiration, then it must be writer’s block.) He stressed on motivation instead of inspiration. He claimed that “[m]any of the problems that writers have do not arise from what they cannot do in writing, but what they do not realize a writer must experience if he is to survive society, and himself.”

This “experience” is not just based from one’s personal history, it’s also built from one’s training in writing. The more years an author gathers onto his/ her pages, the skill flourishes into art. After two years working with Leonard, and his Thursday night Writer’s Group, he gave me the best compliment I had yet welcomed. He told me, as he pointed his finger, “You no longer have the privilege of being lazy!”

Leonard finished an unpublished sequel to Dare to be a Great Writer that same year, titled To Hell with Talent. Taking his ideology and extending it like sprouting tree branches, his goal continued to expose the myths about writing and even writers. Myths that author’s imagination takes control over his/ her writing process. That author’s led exciting lives. That only “talented” people can become writers. As in his first book, his bluntness defied many traditional stereotypes. The fact is an author has complete control in his/ her characters. That most authors have little, if any, social skills. That anyone with ambition and years of patience can become writers. In his preface to Dare, he wrote, “I have not diluted or compromised any of what I know and believed should be written about writing. I have avoided the fluff and cutie-pie meanderings that are useless to the inexperienced writer . . .”

The Invisible Jar

During the autumn of 2002, Leonard was diagnosed with lung cancer. With both radiation and chemotherapy, even at moderate doses, it still forced his immune system to greatly weaken when he then caught pneumonia. Within days he died. It was a shock. Just months after his birthday. Even at the age of 80, his bull-like build and determination seemed to guarantee at least another decade. He had such an energetic and witty presence it seemed absurd to foresee his mortality. He was the Parthenon. With a New Yorkian flair of course.

“You can’t do that,” he used to joke. “You know you can’t say, ‘It’s in the next chapter!’ If you do than it’s a dollar in the jar, baby!”

The philosophy behind it ensured a symbolic awareness towards students’ excuses. Whenever something would be missing, (usually an important piece of information to explain the story, or when a scene dragged and needed excitement to keep a reader’s interest,) often students, myself included, exclaimed that it would be coming soon. Leonard’s point being that it should be in the chapter now.

His writing groups still exist. In New York. In California. And yes, Toto, even in Kansas. The University of Boston dedicated a section with Leonard’s books, notes, film, and tape recordings in its library. To let these groups die would seem insulting. For decades he worked strenuously to teach efficient techniques. If we were smart, we listened and hopefully to restore his wisdom. He cared so much about writing that there was a period in my life I could no longer pay the modest fee of $25. He told me not to worry about it. The purpose of the fee, he explained, was really intended to motivate students to write. “If they feel obligated to pay,” he grinned, tapping his forehead, “then they’ll feel obliged to write.”

I have a box full of the books he collected in half a life-time. And it’s only a fraction of what he stored. His taste ranged from literature to biographies, from world history to other “how to write” books, from dictionaries to thesauruses. I even have one of his coffee mugs with classical French etching. Much like the prints in his house, his love for all forms of art could only be admired. As I understood it, through the people who knew Leonard best, he mellowed through the years, no longer writing in cafeterias at night. He grew more patient and less aggressive. Yet, every morning for over 50 years, he arose at six o’clock to punch on his keyboard. Every morning.

I’m honored to say I knew a great writer. And a teacher of writing. As he inscribed in one of his prefaces: “I believe that if a writer can return to the world more than what the world has given him, then he has earned his keep, not only as a writer, but also as a human being. I also believe that whatever saves my life must be good. I have lived a God-blessed life, and I want to pass it on.” Okay Leonard, here’s the dollar I owe you. I always pay my debts.

Bibliography
Bishop, Leonard. Dare to be a Great Writer: 329 Keys to Powerful Fiction. Cincinnati, Ohio: Writer’s Digest Books, 1988.
Bishop, Leonard. Down All Your Streets. New York, New York: The Dial Press, 1952.
New Voices: American Writing Today. Garden City, New York: Permabooks, 1953.

Posted in Leonard Bishop, Writing | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Writers, Gather ‘Round!

Writers, Gather ‘Round!.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment